I like 4th Edition D&D

Background:  I owned the basic D&D set back in the early 80’s and thought it was amazing.  I never really played it “right” but I loved playing all the same.  I used to go to the student center at the University of South Dakota (I was 9 or 10 at the time) and play D&D with my brother and Tony and Jerry Dunham.  We had a good time.  I did buy some AD&D books over the years, but didn’t really realize that the game had changed, and lost interest.

In 1988 I started playing Warhammer Fantasy and a little bit of HARN.  The crowd I was with was fairly anti-d&D and I became that way as well.  I brought Warhammer to college and shunned the D&D crowds there.  About 3 or 4 years ago I bought back into D&D with the 3.0 and 3.5 editions.  I didn’t really like the game.  I found it easier than what I remembered of AD&D, but still it was too much.  Way too many books to purchase, way too many fiddly rules.  However, much like Warhammer Fantasy Battles, you go where the people are if you want to game, and D&D has the crowds.

Fast forward to 2 weeks ago and I got my hands on the core books for 4e D&D.  I had a fairly good idea of what to expect, but I still was not 100% prepared for what I found.  I have not gotten to play the game yet, but I am working on a game.  In my mind this looks to be a great game.  Here is what I like about it the most:

  • It’s a new version.  Nothing I hate worse than a new version of a game that changes 1/2 a dozen rules, cleans up some typos, and calls itself a new version.  Just enough changes to get everyone to re-buy the book (Warhammer 6th- 7th edition).  This is not that kind of book.  4th edition is a brand new game, based on the same concepts and worlds of D&D.  This is a great way to do things.  The people happy with 3.5 are not forced to change, the people not happy with 3.5 have something new to play, and everyone can play 2 games called D&D with very different experiences.
  • The core Mechanic.  Having one very simple mechanic and offering exceptions to that mechanic make the game fairly easy to teach.  Much more so than 3.5 IMHO.  When I read the 4e books the game generally seems to make sense, and relates well back to the one core mechanic in the game.
  • Powers.  This was something I was a bit worried about, but I think it is going to be OK.  It will, no doubt, lead to endless strings of “powers books”, but the concept is fine.  It seems to make characters more heroic in my mind.  It helps them to stand apart from the crowd better than just having a high dexterity or strength.  I read a number of things that made it sound like “regular” attacks were a thing of the past, but I don’t know if that is really the case after reading the rules.
  • Running the Game.  Reading the DM’s Guide has been a real pleasure.  Setting everything up for a game really does seem to be much simpler.  It tends to follow a similar set of rules whether you are talking about traps, hazards, monsters, or skill encounters.  This makes creating encounters quite easy.  I like the right ups on quests as well.

There are other things to like to be sure.  My least favorite things thus far are really the monsters.  The Monster Manual provides a number of very interesting monsters, but it is confusing to find/create the base monster so that you can customize it the way you want.  It’s not the end of the world, but I would lo v to see “base” stats for each monster type in addition to the more customized versions.

I am VERY excited to get my adventure written and get some gaming done.  I will report back when I do.  I am putting together a wiki for the game, which I will link to once it is ready.

LaterLoop + Kindle = Awesome

I have been playing around with the LaterLoop service recently.  It is by the same guys who make the Mento service I wrote about the other day.  LaterLoop is a very simple concept.  You are browsing the web, you find an article that you want to read, but you do not have time right now.  You add it to LaterLoop and you can read it later.  Simple enough.

LaterLoop does also offer some nice offline viewing options for those who need to take things on the road. Otherwise, LaterLoop is as straight forward as you can get. You install an extension or use a bookmarklet to add articles to LaterLoop.

I was about to give up on LaterLoop, it is nice, but my reading list in my bookmarks and Google Reader were doing just fine.   This was until I clicked on the text-only link in LaterLoop and got an idea.

I fired up my Kindle, browsed to LaterLoop using WhisperNet, and selected one of my saved articles using the text-only link.  Sure enough, perfect fit for the Kindle.  The majority of the UI was gone and I was left with just the meat of the article.  This was a really nice way to set up reading material from the web for viewing on the Kindle.

Google Notebook - IE so much better than Firefox

I like Google products, and use them quite extensively. I use Firefox as my main browser, almost exclusively outside of work. It bothers the crap out me though that the functionality of Google Notebook is so bad in Firefox compared to IE.

I was really hoping that with the release of the Google Toolbar for Firefox 3 they would bring the Notebook functionality up to par with the IE functionality, but they didn’t. The main bit of functionality that is missing in Firefox is the highlighting that appears on the page when you note it in Google Notebook. This annotation is VERY nice in IE, but really non-existent in FF. If you look at the two screenshots below you will see what I mean.

Firefox

Internet Explorer

Mento – The Link Maker

If you follow me on Twitter, FriendFeed, or Ma.gnolia chances are you have seen references to a service called Mento.

Mento is a relatively new service that is designed to make sharing bookmarks easier.  The goal is to take the process of both sharing and saving a bookmark, and reduce it to as few clicks as is needed to get the job done.  Mento does this very well.

Mento is accessed either through a browser extension (for IE or Firefox) or through a standard bookmarklet.  When you want to share a site, you click on either the extension button or on your bookmarklet, and are presented with a window where you can save, share, tag, and describe the page you are viewing.

The Mento web page includes a list of everything you have saved or shared.  It makes it VERY easy to go back and share something again.  The search on Mento is surprisingly fast and accurate.  You get loads of great information about your bookmarks as well.  For each item that you shared you can see the date the item was shared, the tags and description you assigned, the source website, the referring website if you had one.  Take a look at the following screenshot to see what I mean.

When it comes to sharing, Mento really starts to shine.  First, Mento makes it really easy to just e-mail a link to people.  Mento has a contact list feature which puts addresses at your finger tips and makes things very easy.  Mento also includes direct links to FriendFeed, Facebook, Twitter and Ma.gnolia.  You link your accounts and Mento does the work of depositing the link in those services.  FriendFeed and Ma.gnolia happen without any work on your part.  If you want to send to Twitter, you add Twitter to the address bar like you would when sending an e-mail.

Mento has some other nice features as well, like the ability to Reply to others that have already shared a page.  Maybe the best extra feature though is the ability to either include a picture from the page you are sharing, or better still actually take a small screenshot from the page and share that.  The screenshot feature is listed as experimental, but really does work flawlessly.

Overall, I would give Mento three thumbs up if I had them.  I have pretty much replaced my other sharing bookmarklets with Mento and will continue to for quite some time.

The service is still in it’s beta stage, and an invite is required to join the service.  I do have a few invites to share with friends, and access to the beta can be requested on the site.

Firefox 3 Thoughts

I have been using the official release of Firefox 3 for a day or two now, and am really enjoying it.  There are some very subtle but powerful differences which have made me re-think how I have things setup.

The first change is that I have installed the Smart Bookmarks Bar extension and the Personal Menu extension to enhance the already cleaned up interface of FF3.  All of my most used sites are displayed as Favicons on my bookmark bar, and in general everything looks quite nice.

The second change is that I have exported my bookmarks from Ma.gnolia and started working with them inside of Firefox.  The new address bar is quite nice, and when combined with a goo number of well tagged bookmarks I can easily get to what I am looking for.  In fact, I can quickly get to pretty much all the bookmarks on my new bookmarks toolbar just by typing in the tags I have assigned.  I am using some short tags to get to things quickly (newz for my daily news fix, pim for my calendar, mail etc).

I agree with many people that the browser does feel faster, and I have not seen it jack up the RAM usage much…yet.  I am still experiencing some crashes, especially when I close FF.  I think it is extension related, but I have not been able to figure out which one yet.  By the way, I am running the following extensions on my primary laptop (Dell Inspiron 1420 - Her name is Emmy).